What a HORRIBLE roundup of the claimed category. Automated voiceover, which always immediately conveys "cheesy" production, and a lot of bungled or completely missed details in the product descriptions. For example, the Moto Guzzi V7 "Special Edition" is the Moto Guzzi V7 STONE Special Edition, which is what you described as the "stripped down iteration of the V7 model." It's a STONE, gloss black, with the unique black gloss paint with striping. But the motorcycle you SHOWED is the V7 Special, which is a model that's existed for years, an up-market retro version with the (retro) wire wheels, (retro) dual analog gages and so on, chrome accents, chrome passenger grab rail and so on. And while you describe the Kawasaki Z650RS as a smaller version of the Z900RS, and make a reference to the historic significance of the Z900, you completely miss the point that the Z650RS is also an homage to the Z650 of the '60s-'70s, which ALSO shared those design cues back then and was significant in its own 650 cc right.

Strange that you didn't mention the motor power of the Moto Guzzi and Royal Enfield. Even though the same engines of Triumph were mentioned each time. Biased?